About Expertise Work Managed Apps
Business Website Online Store Sales CRM Team Drive Online Academy Newsletter System Booking System Shared Inbox Knowledge Base Short Links Business Manager Photo Gallery Survey Platform Community Forum Project Boards Estate Agency Car Workshop Restaurant Clinic Photography Studio
AWS
Assess & advise Build & migrate Automate & operate Secure & comply Urgent & go-live
Projects
Hosted Monitoring & Dashboards Self-Hosted Observability Stack Bulk Document Data Extraction Email Deliverability Diagnosis & Repair SEO Migration Recovery AWS Security Review VPS Hardening & ModSecurity Cloud Architecture & Resilience Review SSL & Server Configuration Container Security Review DNS & Email Troubleshooting DevOps Deployment & Rollback Review WordPress Hardening Retainer Data Pipeline Rerun Review Metric Reconciliation
Free Tools
Website Health Check Email Domain Health Check DNS Health Check SSL Certificate Checker Redirect Chain Checker Robots.txt Checker XML Sitemap Validator Docker Compose Checker WordPress Security Check AWS IAM / S3 Policy Checker Domain Registration Lookup Uptime Monitoring Trial Downtime Cost Calculator AWS Cost Estimator Cloud Architecture Self-Assessment DevOps Engagement Builder Self-Managed VPS vs Managed AWS
Blog Certifications Hire Me

SOC 2-Oriented AWS Technical Controls

The AWS half of a SOC 2 readiness effort, built so the evidence generates itself.

Price and scope

From $1,399

Typically $1,399–$3,999, fixed in writing before anything starts.

10–20 days
Working days, counted from the moment I have access — not from the day you agree.

What moves it up

  • An audit window already booked, which makes the observation period the binding constraint
  • A compliance platform already in use, whose automated checks have to actually pass rather than be waived
  • Multiple accounts and environments, each needing the same controls demonstrably applied
Why timing decides a Type II reportA timeline showing a SOC 2 Type II observation period ending at fieldwork. A control implemented before the period begins produces months of evidence. An identical control implemented a week before fieldwork produces almost none.observation periodfieldworkcontrol in placebefore the periodmonths of evidencesame controla week beforealmost nonethe auditor observes that it operated, not that it exists
SOC 2-Oriented AWS Technical Controls

What actually goes wrong

SOC 2 is not a technical standard, and treating it as one is what makes the first audit expensive. A Type II report is an auditor observing that your controls operated over a period — typically three to twelve months — so a control implemented the week before fieldwork has no evidence behind it and does not count. The specific thing that goes wrong on the AWS side is that everything is configured correctly and nothing records that it stayed configured correctly. Access reviews happened in a conversation, change approvals live in someone's memory, and the auditor asks for a quarter of screenshots nobody took.

How I find it

  • aws configservice describe-config-rules — whether compliance is continuously evaluated or periodically remembered
  • aws securityhub get-findings against the AWS Foundational Security Best Practices standard
  • aws iam generate-credential-report as the access review artefact, dated and stored rather than read and discarded
  • Change history in CloudTrail correlated to approvals, which is the pairing auditors ask for first

What you get

  • AWS Config and Security Hub evaluating the relevant controls continuously, with drift alerting
  • Access reviews producing a dated, stored artefact rather than a conversation
  • Change management evidence linking a production change to its approval
  • Encryption, logging, backup and monitoring controls implemented and each mapped to a Trust Services criterion
  • A gap list naming what is NOT technical — the policies and processes you still have to own

Questions

Can you get us SOC 2 certified?

No. Only a licensed CPA firm can issue a SOC 2 report, and I am not one. What I can do is build and evidence the AWS technical controls so that the auditor's infrastructure questions have real answers, which is usually the part engineering teams are least ready for.

When should this happen relative to the audit?

Before the observation period starts, not before fieldwork. A Type II report observes controls operating over months, so anything implemented the week before is a control with no history — and that is the single most common and most expensive scheduling mistake.

Do we still need Vanta or Drata?

They are genuinely useful for policies, training, vendor management and chasing people. They also raise alerts that need real infrastructure work to clear, which is where this fits. A platform on its own produces a list of things nobody has done.

Which Trust Services criteria does this cover?

Security in full on the infrastructure side, and most of Availability and Confidentiality. Processing Integrity and Privacy are largely about your application and your business processes rather than your cloud, and the gap list says so explicitly rather than implying coverage that is not there.

Want this done?

Tell me what you are running and I will come back with a fixed price and a date. If it turns out you do not need this, I will say that instead.

Prefer to talk? Book a free call ↗  ·  Or hire me on Upwork ↗  ·  Typical reply within one business day.

When I answer

Sunday to Thursday, 09:00–18:00 EET. Outside that I will still look, but I will not promise a time.

No 24/7 desk, and I will not pretend otherwise

One person, one time zone. If round-the-clock cover is what you need, you need a team, and I will say so rather than sell you a plan that cannot deliver it.

Your AWS bill stays yours

You pay Amazon directly and you keep control of the account. Nothing here resells your infrastructure or sits between you and your own billing.

A price that starts with "from" is a starting price

Every service page lists exactly what pushes a quote above it, before you ask. You get a fixed number in writing before any work begins.