<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Route 53 | John Nessime</title>
	<atom:link href="https://john-nessime.com/blog/tag/route-53/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://john-nessime.com/blog/tag/route-53/</link>
	<description>Cloud, DevOps, Data &#38; AI — Built, Tested, Explained</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:05:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Salesforce AWS PrivateLink: The Failures Nobody Warns You About</title>
		<link>https://john-nessime.com/blog/technical-guides/salesforce-aws-privatelink/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Nessime]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2026 06:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Cloud Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Guides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cloud Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyperforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interface Endpoint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Named Credentials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Isolation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private Hosted Zone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PrivateLink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rate Limiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Route 53]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salesforce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salesforce Private Connect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transit Gateway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VPC Flow Logs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://john-nessime.com/blog/?p=330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Salesforce Private Connect over AWS PrivateLink does not fail loudly. It fails by working: green statuses, successful callouts, and packets still crossing the public internet because one DNS record was wrong. Here are the six failure families that actually bite, and how to prove your traffic is private.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://john-nessime.com/blog/technical-guides/salesforce-aws-privatelink/">Salesforce AWS PrivateLink: The Failures Nobody Warns You About</a> appeared first on <a href="https://john-nessime.com/blog">John Nessime</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The ticket said the integration was &#8220;already private.&#8221; Someone had bought the license, clicked through the setup wizard, seen a green status in the org, and closed the epic. Six weeks later a security review pulled VPC flow logs and asked a simple question: why is this traffic still leaving through the NAT gateway?</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">That is the failure mode worth understanding before you touch anything. A Salesforce AWS PrivateLink setup does not fail loudly. It fails by working. The callout succeeds, the payload arrives, the dashboard is green, and the packets went over the public internet anyway because one DNS record was wrong. Nothing in either console tells you.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This post covers what actually breaks when you wire Salesforce to AWS over private connectivity: the DNS trap above, the throughput ceiling nobody budgets for, the TLS and port constraints, why your sandbox cannot rehearse the change, and how to prove after the fact that traffic really is staying on the AWS network.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What Private Connect actually gives you</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce Private Connect is the product name. AWS PrivateLink is the underlying mechanism. Salesforce runs a managed transit VPC in each supported AWS region, and you attach to it: either your VPC creates an interface endpoint pointing at their endpoint service, or their transit VPC creates an endpoint pointing at yours.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Two things people consistently get wrong here.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">First, the direction naming is from the org&#8217;s point of view, not yours. <strong>Inbound</strong> means traffic entering Salesforce, so your AWS workload calling the Salesforce REST or Bulk API. <strong>Outbound</strong> means Salesforce calling out to something you host. If you are an AWS engineer, &#8220;inbound&#8221; is the one that feels like outbound to you. Half the confused meetings I have seen on this trace back to that single word.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Second, Private Connect only builds the pipe. It does not move data. You still need Apex callouts, External Services, Platform Events, MuleSoft, Amazon AppFlow, or whatever else was already doing the work. If your integration is broken today, a private path will carry the broken requests privately.</p>



<blockquote class="is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow"><p>Private connectivity is a network property, not an application feature. Nothing above layer 4 changes. Plan the rollout as a routing change, not an integration project.</p></blockquote>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Failure family one: DNS that quietly resolves to the public internet</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the one that produced the ticket at the top, and it is by far the most common way a Salesforce AWS PrivateLink deployment ends up decorative.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For the inbound case, your application calls a hostname like <code>yourorg.my.salesforce.com</code>. That hostname resolves publicly. Creating the interface endpoint does not change that. Unless something inside your VPC overrides the answer, the resolver returns Salesforce&#8217;s public addresses and your traffic takes the normal internet path. The endpoint sits there costing you money and carrying nothing.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The override is a Route 53 private hosted zone, associated with the VPC that holds the endpoint, containing a record that points the org hostname at the endpoint. Salesforce&#8217;s own walkthrough names the zone <code>my.salesforce.com</code> and puts the org-specific record inside it.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Three things have to line up or the override silently does nothing:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><strong>The zone is associated with the right VPC.</strong> A private hosted zone answers only for VPCs it is attached to. Query it from anywhere else and the request falls through to public recursion.</li><li><strong>The VPC has DNS support and DNS hostnames enabled.</strong> Both attributes must be on, or the VPC resolver will not serve the zone at all.</li><li><strong>Callers actually use the VPC resolver.</strong> Workloads pinned to an external resolver, containers with a hardcoded <code>nameserver</code> line, or on-premises clients arriving over Direct Connect will bypass the zone entirely unless you front it with a Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint.</li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">There is a sharp edge in the other direction too. If a private hosted zone matches the queried name but contains no record of the right type, Route 53 returns NXDOMAIN rather than falling through to public DNS. So a half-finished zone does not degrade gracefully, it takes the hostname down. Creating the zone and the record in separate change windows is how teams turn a routing improvement into an outage.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Verify from inside the VPC, not from your laptop:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code># Run this on an instance in the VPC associated with the private zone.
dig +short yourorg.my.salesforce.com

# You want RFC 1918 addresses from your endpoint subnets.
# Public addresses mean the private zone is not being consulted.

# Confirm which resolver answered:
dig yourorg.my.salesforce.com | grep -i "SERVER:"</code></pre>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Failure family two: the throughput ceiling nobody reads</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Private Connect is rate limited, and the default entitlement is small enough to catch people out badly.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce documents an initial license entitlement of 225 MB of data per hour, measured separately for inbound and outbound, with an add-on ceiling far higher. The allowance does not roll over. It resets on the hour.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Now consider what a nightly Bulk API extract looks like. A few gigabytes pushed in a twenty minute window is entirely normal and completely incompatible with a 225 MB hourly bucket. The two directions behave differently when you hit the wall, which matters more than the number itself:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><strong>Outbound is enforced technically.</strong> Exceed it and outbound traffic stops until the counter resets at the top of the next hour. Your Apex callouts start failing. This is a production incident.</li><li><strong>Inbound is enforced contractually.</strong> Salesforce documents that you are responsible for monitoring and enforcing the inbound limit yourself. Nothing throttles you at the network layer, but you are outside your agreement, and standard enterprise API limits still apply on top.</li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The outbound allowance is visible through the Limits API as <code>PrivateConnectOutboundCalloutHourlyLimitMB</code>, which is what makes it monitorable. Poll it, put it on a dashboard next to your other API limit metrics in Grafana or CloudWatch, and alert well before exhaustion rather than after the callouts fail.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your volume genuinely exceeds the entitlement, the honest options are buying more, reshaping the workload to spread across hours, or accepting that bulk movement stays on a different path and Private Connect covers only your latency-sensitive transactional traffic. That last one is a legitimate architecture, not a failure.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Failure family three: TLS, SNI, and the port you cannot use</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Private Connect inbound supports port 443 only. Port 8443 is explicitly not supported because Salesforce uses it for mutual TLS. If your integration depends on client certificate authentication on that port, this design does not cover it, and finding out during cutover is expensive.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The subtler problem is SNI. Salesforce documents that Hyperforce requires callers to include the Server Name Indication extension in the TLS ClientHello so the right certificate can be served, and that clients calling a hostname outside the <code>*.my.salesforce.com</code> or <code>*.sandbox.my.salesforce.com</code> patterns will hit HTTPS errors. Browsers always send SNI. Older HTTP libraries, embedded clients, and some middleware stacks do not.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The reason this bites specifically during a PrivateLink migration is that you are changing what the name resolves to while keeping the name identical. A client that was quietly relying on the public path&#8217;s behavior now hits a different frontend. Test the handshake explicitly:</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code># From inside the VPC, forcing SNI to the org hostname.
openssl s_client -connect yourorg.my.salesforce.com:443 
  -servername yourorg.my.salesforce.com &lt;/dev/null

# Compare with SNI omitted. If this one fails and the above
# succeeds, your client library is the problem, not the network.
openssl s_client -connect yourorg.my.salesforce.com:443 &lt;/dev/null</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">On the outbound side the mirror image applies. Salesforce is the client calling your endpoint service, and it will validate your certificate against the hostname it was told to use. If your Network Load Balancer terminates TLS with a certificate whose subject alternative names do not include the private DNS name you registered, the callout fails on hostname verification. Issue the certificate for a name you control and that matches what the named credential targets.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Failure family four: you cannot rehearse this properly</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This one deserves its own section because it changes how you plan the work.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Private connections are not copied from production into sandboxes. You recreate them. And the ability to recreate them depends on sandbox type:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><strong>Full and Partial Copy sandboxes:</strong> you can create connections and provision them. This is where genuine rehearsal happens.</li><li><strong>Developer and Developer Pro sandboxes:</strong> you can create connections but cannot provision them.</li><li><strong>Scratch orgs and Developer orgs:</strong> create only, no provisioning.</li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If your organization only has Developer sandboxes, there is no lower environment where the private path can be exercised end to end. That is a procurement conversation, not an engineering one, and it needs to happen at design time. Budget for a Full or Partial Copy sandbox or accept that production is your first real test.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Related trap: connections are packageable while unprovisioned, and unprovisioned connections do not consume a license. That is useful for shipping configuration through a deployment pipeline, but it also means a successful deploy proves nothing about connectivity.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Failure family five: license arithmetic and connection identity</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Each Private Connect license covers one provisioned connection in each direction. Each connection is a one-to-one mapping between an org ID and a VPC endpoint ID.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Read that mapping carefully, because it is where multi-account AWS estates get expensive. Separate VPCs mean separate endpoints mean separate connections mean separate licenses. Separate orgs mean the same again. A design with three application VPCs across two orgs is not one connection, it is six.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The architectural answer is usually a shared services or egress VPC that owns the endpoint, with the application VPCs reaching it through a Transit Gateway. You pay for one endpoint and route to it. This is the same centralized-endpoint pattern you would already use for interface endpoints to AWS services, and the reasoning is identical: endpoints are billed per attachment, so consolidate them.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Four inbound connections consume four licenses. If you hold four licenses, you have used all of them and have none left for outbound. Count both directions before the renewal conversation.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Failure family six: the AWS side of an outbound connection</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For outbound, you are the service provider. Salesforce&#8217;s transit VPC creates the endpoint into your account, which means you have to build a proper endpoint service.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The sequence, in the order that avoids rework:</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li>Stand up a Network Load Balancer in front of your service, across at least two Availability Zones.</li><li>Create the VPC endpoint service backed by that NLB.</li><li>Copy the IAM role ARN from the Private Connect setup page in Salesforce for your region, and add it to the allowed principals on the endpoint service. Without this, Salesforce cannot connect and the failure looks like a generic timeout.</li><li>Register a private DNS name on the endpoint service and complete domain ownership verification.</li><li>Create the outbound connection in Salesforce using the endpoint service name, then sync it to pick up the AWS-side status.</li><li>Associate the connection with a named credential. Callouts only take the private path when they go through a named credential bound to that connection.</li></ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Step four is where people lose an afternoon. Domain verification requires a TXT record in a <em>public</em> zone, because AWS queries the public name servers registered at your domain&#8217;s registrar. Put the record in a private hosted zone and verification sits in pending forever with no useful error.</p>



<pre class="wp-block-code"><code># Register the private DNS name on your endpoint service.
aws ec2 modify-vpc-endpoint-service-configuration 
  --service-id vpce-svc-EXAMPLE 
  --private-dns-name "sf-integration.example.com"

# Read back the TXT record name and value AWS expects.
aws ec2 describe-vpc-endpoint-service-configurations 
  --service-ids vpce-svc-EXAMPLE 
  --query 'ServiceConfigurations[0].PrivateDnsNameConfiguration'

# After publishing the TXT record in your PUBLIC zone:
aws ec2 start-vpc-endpoint-service-private-dns-verification 
  --service-id vpce-svc-EXAMPLE</code></pre>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">One detail worth knowing: if verification status later changes away from verified, new connection requests are refused while existing connections keep working. So a lapsed TXT record does not break you immediately. It breaks you the next time something reconnects, which is usually during an unrelated incident.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">What this costs, mechanically</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Rates change, so model the mechanism rather than memorizing figures from a blog post.</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li><strong>Interface endpoint hours.</strong> Billed per endpoint, per Availability Zone, per hour, whether or not traffic flows. A three-AZ deployment is three billable attachments.</li><li><strong>Data processing.</strong> Per GB through the endpoint, on a tiered scale that drops as regional volume rises.</li><li><strong>Cross-AZ transfer through interface endpoints.</strong> AWS removed this charge, so multi-AZ endpoint placement is a resilience decision rather than a cost trade-off.</li><li><strong>Cross-region.</strong> Still charged, in both directions, plus a per-hour fee on the endpoint service for each remote region with attached endpoints. Match your org region to your VPC region if you can.</li><li><strong>Provider-side infrastructure.</strong> For outbound, the NLB and its targets are your bill, not PrivateLink&#8217;s.</li><li><strong>The Salesforce license.</strong> Separate from all of the above, priced per connection.</li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Compare honestly against what you are replacing. If the alternative is a NAT gateway carrying the same traffic, NAT has both an hourly charge and a per-GB processing charge of its own, and the comparison is often closer than people assume. If the alternative is a site-to-site VPN or a commercial network overlay, the calculus changes again. PrivateLink wins on the security posture, not automatically on the invoice.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Troubleshooting: proving the traffic is actually private</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Do not trust a green status field. Prove it with evidence from the data path.</p>



<ol class="wp-block-list"><li><strong>Resolve the hostname from inside the VPC.</strong> Private addresses from your endpoint subnets, or nothing else matters.</li><li><strong>Check the endpoint state.</strong> <code>aws ec2 describe-vpc-endpoints</code> should show the endpoint available, with an ENI in each subnet you expect.</li><li><strong>Read VPC flow logs.</strong> Filter for your application&#8217;s source addresses and confirm the destination is the endpoint ENI, not a NAT gateway or internet gateway address. This is the actual proof.</li><li><strong>Check the security group on the endpoint.</strong> Interface endpoints carry security groups. If 443 is not permitted from your application subnets, connections hang rather than refuse, which reads as a Salesforce problem in your logs.</li><li><strong>For outbound, sync the connection in Salesforce</strong> before believing its status. The displayed state is the last polled AWS state, not live.</li><li><strong>Test the callout through the named credential.</strong> A direct callout to a hardcoded URL will not use the private path even when everything else is correct.</li></ol>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Two symptom patterns worth recognizing. Connections that hang and time out point at security groups or NLB target health. Connections that fail fast with a TLS error point at certificate naming or SNI. They are diagnosed in completely different places.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Common mistakes</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Treating the setup wizard&#8217;s success message as proof that traffic is private. It proves the control plane is configured.</li><li>Creating the private hosted zone in one change and the record in another, producing NXDOMAIN for the org hostname in between.</li><li>Publishing the domain verification TXT record in a private zone instead of the public one.</li><li>Forgetting the Salesforce IAM role in the allowed principals list on the endpoint service, then debugging it as a network problem.</li><li>Sizing the connection for peak batch throughput without checking the hourly data entitlement.</li><li>Assuming sessions locked to their originating IP address will keep working. That behavior is documented as unsupported with Private Connect, along with asynchronous callouts using Apex continuations.</li><li>Building one endpoint per application VPC and discovering the license count at renewal.</li><li>Leaving callouts on hardcoded endpoints instead of named credentials, so outbound traffic never enters the private path.</li></ul>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Best practices for a Salesforce AWS PrivateLink rollout</h2>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Inventory every integration touching the org first, with direction, protocol, hostname, and peak volume per hour. The inventory determines the design.</li><li>Centralize endpoints in a shared services VPC and route from application VPCs through Transit Gateway rather than duplicating endpoints and licenses.</li><li>Put the endpoint in the same region as the org. Cross-region private connectivity works but gives up most of the latency benefit and adds transfer charges.</li><li>Enable VPC flow logs before cutover so you have a clean before-and-after picture. Ship them somewhere you can query, whether that is CloudWatch Logs Insights, Athena over S3, or a platform like Grafana Cloud or Datadog.</li><li>Alert on the outbound hourly limit as a percentage of entitlement, not on callout failures. By the time callouts fail you are already down.</li><li>Terraform the AWS side. The endpoint, the endpoint service, the allowed principals, the private hosted zone, and the records all belong in code. The Salesforce side is click-configured, so document it in the same repository as a runbook.</li><li>Keep a documented rollback: the change that reverts you to public routing is removing or disassociating the private hosted zone, and it should be a one-step action you have practiced.</li><li>Review the configuration on a schedule. Private routing is invisible in normal operation and easy to break with an unrelated DNS or VPC change.</li></ul>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Frequently asked questions</h2>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Does Private Connect encrypt my traffic?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Your traffic is already encrypted in transit by TLS. What private connectivity changes is the path, not the cipher. The value is that packets stay on the AWS network rather than traversing the public internet, which removes an entire class of exposure and simplifies a lot of compliance conversations. It is not a substitute for TLS, and it does not authenticate anything.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Can I use Private Connect to access the Salesforce user interface privately?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No. This is API-path connectivity for integrations. Browser access to the org is a separate concern, and if that is what you need, you are looking at conditional access policies, login IP ranges, or a corporate network solution rather than PrivateLink.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">What Salesforce features actually route through an outbound connection?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce documents outbound support for Apex callouts, External Services, Platform Events, Change Data Capture, CRM Analytics, the OData 4.01 adapter and custom adapter for Salesforce Connect, the Salesforce Connect SQL adapter for Amazon Athena, and Agent Actions backed by External Services. Inbound covers the supported public APIs. Anything not on the current list should be verified against the documentation before you design around it, because that list grows.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Do I need Hyperforce for this?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Salesforce states that Private Connect works whether the org sits in first-party data centers or on Hyperforce. That said, Hyperforce brings its own requirements, particularly the SNI behavior described above, so confirm where your org actually runs before you start debugging TLS.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">How do I connect on-premises systems, not just AWS workloads?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Bring the on-premises network into AWS first with Direct Connect or a site-to-site VPN, then use the interface endpoint from there. The extra work is DNS: on-premises resolvers need a Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint to see the private hosted zone, otherwise they resolve the org hostname publicly and you are back to the first failure family.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Can I use one connection for several Salesforce orgs?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No. A connection is a one-to-one mapping between an org ID and a VPC endpoint ID, so each org needs its own provisioned connection and its own license, even if they all point at the same VPC.</p>



<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Is a VPN a reasonable alternative?</h3>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">For Salesforce specifically, no. Salesforce does not terminate a customer VPN into the org, so PrivateLink is the mechanism on offer. A VPN or a commercial overlay such as NordLayer solves a different problem, which is getting your own users and sites onto your own network. Where those tools genuinely overlap is the on-premises leg, and even there Direct Connect is usually the better answer for sustained integration traffic.</p>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">The one thing to remember</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">A Salesforce AWS PrivateLink deployment that is misconfigured looks exactly like one that works. Same green statuses, same successful callouts, same clean application logs. The only difference is which path the packets took, and the only place that difference is visible is your flow logs.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">So build the verification step into the project rather than the postmortem. Resolve the hostname from inside the VPC, read the flow logs, confirm the destination is the endpoint ENI, and keep the check running afterwards. Everything else in this post is detail. That one habit is what separates private connectivity from a line item that says private.</p>



<hr class="wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity"/>



<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Need help wiring Salesforce to AWS privately?</h2>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">This is the kind of work where a second pair of eyes on the DNS and the flow logs saves a security review later. I help teams with:</p>



<ul class="wp-block-list"><li>Designing the endpoint topology, including centralized endpoints behind Transit Gateway so you are not buying a connection per VPC.</li><li>Building and verifying the Route 53 private hosted zone override, including Resolver inbound endpoints for on-premises callers.</li><li>Standing up the endpoint service side for outbound connections: NLB, allowed principals, private DNS name registration, and domain verification.</li><li>Proving traffic is genuinely private with VPC flow log analysis, before and after cutover.</li><li>Instrumenting the hourly data entitlement so you find out about throttling from a dashboard rather than from failed callouts.</li><li>Codifying the AWS side in Terraform or OpenTofu, with a documented rollback to public routing.</li></ul>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you are mid-way through one of these and something is not behaving, send me the <code>dig</code> output from inside the VPC, a flow log sample, or your endpoint service configuration and I will tell you what I see.</p>



<div class="wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex">
<div class="wp-block-button"><a class="wp-block-button__link wp-element-button" href="https://www.upwork.com/freelancers/~01f15a912ad84a6620" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Work with me on Upwork</a></div>
</div>
<p>The post <a href="https://john-nessime.com/blog/technical-guides/salesforce-aws-privatelink/">Salesforce AWS PrivateLink: The Failures Nobody Warns You About</a> appeared first on <a href="https://john-nessime.com/blog">John Nessime</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
